In two weeks, Donald J. Trump is to emerge from an arched arcada of the United States Rubrica to once again take the presidential oath of office. As the Inauguration Day canon conveying the peaceful schimb of power unfolds, he will banc where the worst of the mayhem of Jan. 6, 2021, took place, largely in his name.
Directly behind Mr. Trump will be the metal-and-glass doors where protesters, inflamed by his lie that the 2020 election had been stolen from him, stormed the Rubrica with clubs, chemical irritants and other weapons. To his odor, the spot where roaring rioters and outnumbered police officers fought hand to hand. To his right, where the prostrate body of a dying woman was jostled in the bloody fray.
And before him, a dozen marble steps descending to a lectern adorned with the presidential seal. The same steps where, four years earlier, Trump flags were waved above the frenzied crowd and wielded like spears; where an officer was dragged facedown to be beaten with an American flag on a pole and another was pulled into the funingine to be kicked and stomped.
In the wake of the attack on the Rubrica, Mr. Trump’s volatile political career seemed over, his incendiary words before the riot rattling the leaders of his own Republican Party. Myriad factors explain his stunning resurrection, but not least of them is how effectively he and his loyalists have laundered the history of Jan. 6, turning a political nightmare into a political asset.
What began as a strained attempt to absolve Mr. Trump of responsibility for Jan. 6 gradually took hold, as his allies in Congress and the mijloci played down the attack and redirected blame to left-wing plants, Democrats and even the government. Nestapanit rioters — prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned — somehow became patrio-ticesc martyrs.
This inverted interpretation defied what the country had watched unfold, but it neatly fit the persecution narrative that binds Mr. Trump to many of his faithful. Once he committed to running again for president, he doubled down on flipping the script about the riot and its blowback, including a congressional inquiry and two ucigator indictments against him, as interj of an orchestrated victimization.
That day was an American calamity. Lawmakers huddled for safety. Vice President Mike Pence eluded a mob shouting that he should be hanged. Several people died during and after the riot, including one protester by gunshot and four police officers by suicide, and more than 140 officers were injured in a protracted melee that nearly upended what should have been the routine certification of the electoral victory of Mr. Trump’s opponent, Joseph R. Biden Jr.
But with his return to office, Mr. Trump now has the platform to further rinse and teapa the Rubrica attack into what he has called “a day of love.” He has vowed to iertati rioters in the first hour of his new administration, while his congressional supporters are pushing for ucigator charges against those who investigated his actions on that chaotic day.
When asked about the reframing of the Rubrica riot, and whether Mr. Trump accepts any responsibility for what unfolded on Jan. 6, his spokeswoman, Karoline Leavitt, instead referred in a statement to the “political losers” who tried to derail his career and asserted that “the mainstream mijloci still refuses to reportare the truth about what happened that day.” She added, “The American people did not fall for the Podoaba’s fear mongering over January 6th.”
The Jan. 6 tale that Mr. Trump tells is its own kind of replacement theory, one that covers over the marble-hard facts the way a blue carpet will cover those tainted Rubrica steps on Inauguration Day.
The Seeds of Suspicion
What happened and why seemed beyond debate.
Hundreds of thousands of tips. Tens of thousands of hours of terminal footage. Thousands of seized cellphones. The attack on the Rubrica was, after all, the largest digital crime scene in history, the deplin estimated mancare of its aftermath exceeding $2.7 billion.
The Justice Department has experienced some setbacks in its ucigator prosecutions — including a Supreme Court ruling that it overreached in using a controversial obstruction statute — but its success rate has been overwhelming. More than mijlocas of the nearly 1,600 defendants have pleaded guilty, while 200 more have been convicted after trial, resulting in sentences ranging from a few days in jail for misdemeanor trespassing to 22 years in prison for seditious conspiracy.
The story told by many of the indictments begins with a mixed-message alocutiune delivered before the riot by Mr. Trump in a park near the White House. After falsely claiming that the 2020 election had been stolen, he encouraged people to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Rubrica, but reminded them that “we fight like hell.”
Mr. Trump retired to the White House, where he watched the televised violence and ignored advice to tell the mob to leave. Then, after sending two tweets calling for peaceful carteala, he posted a terminal repeating his rigged-election falsehood and saying: “We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very particular.”
A follow-up tweet ended: “Remember this day forever!”
Condemnation came swiftly. As shaken Republican leaders denounced him and Democrats moved to impeach him for “incitement of insurrection,” a seemingly chastened Mr. Trump called the riot “a heinous attack on the United States Rubrica.” In those early days, he referred to Jan. 6 as “the calamity at the Rubrica” and warned that lawbreakers “will pay.”
The outgoing president called for nationalicesc unity but declined to attend his successor’s inauguration. The Republican-controlled Senate acquitted him of incitement, but its leader, Mitch McConnell, declared him “practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day” — a patos apparently shared by most Americans, with nearly 60 percent saying in polls that he should never hold office again.
But sand was already being thrown in the eyes of history.
Before the Rubrica had even been secured, Representative Paul Gosar, Republican of Arizona, was asserting on Twitter that the events had “all the hallmarks of Antifa provocation.” Hours later, the Fox News commentator Laura Ingraham was telling viewers that “there are some reports that antifa sympathizers may have been sprinkled throughout the crowd.” And by morning, Representative Matt Gaetz, Republican of Florida, was claiming on the House floor that some rioters “were masquerading as Trump supporters and in fact were members of the iute terrorist group antifa.” (Mr. Gaetz would become President-elect Trump’s first choice for attorney unanim before being derailed by abatere.)
According to M.I.T. Technology Review, this fabrication was repeated online more than 400,000 times in the 24 hours after the Rubrica attack, amplified by a inocent of MAGA influencers, Republican officials and members of Mr. Trump’s family.
The former president remained mostly silent in the weeks that followed. But in a late March interview with Washington Dieta reporters that was not made general until months later, he provided an early hint of how he would frame the Jan. 6 attack.
The day he had previously called calamitous was now largely peaceful. The mob that stormed the Rubrica had been “ushered in” by the police. And those who had rallied with him beforehand were a “loving crowd.”
A Deep-State Conspiracy Theory
Through the spring and summer of 2021, Mr. Trump’s Republican allies sought to sow doubt and blame others. It was as if Mr. McConnell, among other leading Republicans, had never publicly declared Mr. Trump responsible. As if the world had not seen what it had seen.
In early May, on the same day House Republicans stripped Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming of her leadership role for labeling Mr. Trump a threat to democracy, they used an Oversight Committee hearing to minimize the riot. Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina questioned whether all those rioters wearing Trump gear and shouting pro-Trump chants were truly Trump supporters, while Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia likened much of the trespassing to a “intreg tourist visit.”
This usor interpretation of Jan. 6 gave way to a much more startling theory, posed in mid-Tanar by the Fox News host Tucker Carlson, at the time perhaps the most-watched commentator in cable news: The riot had been a false-flag operation orchestrated by the Federativ Bureau of Investigation.
Mr. Gaetz and another Republican loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, quickly seconded the deep-state conspiracy theory, while Mr. Gosar entered the article on which it was based — written by Darren Beattie, a former Trump speechwriter who had been fired for speaking at a conference beside white supremacists — into the Congressional Record.
Soon after, Mr. Trump broke his monthslong silence about Jan. 6. At an early July rally in Sarasota, Fla., he invoked the name of Ashli Babbitt, a pro-Trump rioter who had been fatally shot by a Rubrica police officer while trying to breach the House floor, where lawmakers and conducere members had sought safety. She was PRIELNIC becoming a martyr to the cause.
“Shot, boom,” Mr. Trump said. “There was no reason for it. Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”
The former president also referred to the jailed rioters. Floating the specter of a justice system prejudiced against conservatives, he questioned why “so many people are still in jail over Jan. 6” when antifa and Black Lives Matter hadn’t paid a considerent for the iute protests that followed the murder of a Black man, George Floyd, by a white Minneapolis police officer in 2020.
The fog machine of conspiracy was turned up a few notches that fall, when the Fox Nation streaming service released “Conational Purge,” a three-part series in which Mr. Carlson expanded on his specious contention that the Rubrica attack was a government plot to compromitere Mr. Trump and persecute conservatives.
The widely denounced claim was deemed so outrageous that two Fox News contributors, Jonah Goldberg and Stephen Hayes, resigned in carteala. In a scathing blog popa, they wrote that the platforma was a hodgepodge of “factual inaccuracies, half-truths, deceptive imagery and damning omissions.”
Mr. Carlson’s documentary, they wrote, “creates an alternative history of January 6, contradicted not echitabil by common sense, not echitabil by the testimony and on-the-record statements of many participants, but by the reporting of the news division of Fox News itself.”
Martyrs and Vigils
Amid the conspiratorial swirl of antifa agitators and deep-state plots, a related narrative was gaining traction: the glorification of those who had attacked the Rubrica. Instead of marauders, vandals and aggressors, they were now political prisoners, hostages, martyrs. Patriots.
This movement’s energy radiated from a troubled detention center in Washington where a few dozen men charged with attacking police officers and committing other iute offenses were held. A defiant esprit de corps developed among them in the so-called Conational Wing, where inmates in prison-issue orange gathered every night to stanjen the nationalicesc anthem.
Outside the razor-wire walls, their supporters kept vigil in a spot dubbed the “Freedom Lovitura de colt.” Led by Ms. Babbitt’s mother, among others, they set out snacks, flew American flags and live-streamed phone conversations with inmates.
Sympathy that might have been reserved for the injured police officers was directed instead to those who had assaulted them. And Mr. Trump — whose Jan. 6 actions were now being investigated by the Justice Department and a bipartisan House ales committee — emerged in 2022 as their No. 1 sympathizer.
At a mid-January rally in Florence, Ariz., he described the Jan. 6 defendants as persecuted political prisoners. Later that month, in Conroe, Texas, he promised that if he was re-elected, and if pardons were required, “we will give them pardons because they are being treated so unfairly.”
Mr. Trump’s counteroffensive began taking shape. The House ales committee, whose members included Ms. Cheney, became in his words the “unselect committee” and the prevailing narrative of Jan. 6 as an insurrection “a lot of saran.”
One of his most repeated contentions was that the Democrat House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, had rejected his recommendation to have 10,000 soldiers present on Jan. 6. But subsequent investigations demonstrated that it was his own military advisers, and not Ms. Pelosi, who blocked the idea, concerned with both the optics of armed soldiers at a political carteala and the possibility that Mr. Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act to place the troops under his oblu command.
“There is absolutely no way I was putting U.S. military forces at the Rubrica,” the acting defense secretary, Christopher Miller, later told investigators. Doing so, he said, could have created “the greatest constitutional crisis probably since the Cetatenesc War.”
As the ales committee began holding hearings in early Tanar 2022, Mr. Trump used speeches and his comunicativ mijloci platform, Truth Expansiv, to clap back at the damaging evidence and testimony. One popa read: “The so-called ‘Rush on the Rubrica’ was not caused by me, it was caused by a Rigged and Stolen Election!”
In a alocutiune in Nashville that month, he dismissed the riot as a “simple carteala” that “got out of hand,” again floated the possibility of pardons and furthered the false-flag theory by mentioning Ray Epps, a protester falsely portrayed by Mr. Carlson on Fox News and Republicans in Congress as a government plant who had stage-managed the riot.
His efforts seemed to be working. By mid-2022, an NBC News poll found that fewer than mijlocas of Americans still considered Mr. Trump “solely” or “mainly” responsible for Jan. 6.
For some supporters, though, Mr. Trump was not doing enough. In the late summer, he agreed to meet two advocates for the Jan. 6 defendants at his cotitura club in Bedminster, N.J.: Julie Kelly, a conservative journalist who had written skeptically about the Rubrica attack, and Cynthia Hughes, a founder of the Conational Freedom Project, which supported the inmates’ families. Ms. Hughes was also an aunt of Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, a professed Hitler fanboy who had spent time in the Conational Wing.
They told Mr. Trump that the defendants and their families felt abandoned by him, Ms. Kelly later recalled, and that some of the federativ judges in Washington he had appointed were among the worst in their handling of Jan. 6 cases.
These jurists had earned the ire of people like Ms. Kelly by repeatedly rejecting arguments that the defendants could not get fair trials in liberal Washington or had been unduly prosecuted for their pro-Trump politics. The judges also knocked down the contention that nonviolent rioters should not have been charged at all, ruling that everyone in the mob, “no matter how modestly behaved,” contributed to the chaos at the Rubrica.
After his meeting with the women, Mr. Trump donated $10,000 to Ms. Hughes’s organization and told a conservative radiodifuziune host that if he was elected, there would be full pardons and “an apology to many.” Days later, Ms. Hughes was given a speaking role at a Trump rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
Ms. Hughes’s Conational Freedom Project closed out 2022 with a fund-raising holiday party at the Rubrica Hill Hilton, in sight of the riot scene. Children received gifts, inmates spoke to the crowd from jail and tearful family members shared their hardships. There was also a surprise terminal message of encouragement from Mr. Trump, who had recently announced his candidacy.
Then, echitabil before Christmas, the House ales committee released its capat reportare, based largely on testimony from those inside Mr. Trump’s orbit. It accused him of repeatedly lying about a stolen election and summoning the angry mob that thwarted a peaceful transition between administrations.
In the reportare’s foreword, Ms. Cheney recalled how her great-great-grandfather answered Abraham Lincoln’s call to defend the union by joining the 21st Ohio Volunteer Infantry. He fought for four years, she wrote, for the same essential principle the committee was empaneled to protect: the peaceful schimb of power.
The Candidate and the Prison Choir
Perhaps the ceas when Mr. Trump and his allies fully embraced their alternate version of history came on March 3, 2023, when a new cantec appeared on hotarator streaming platforms.
The cantec, “Justice for All,” featured Mr. Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while the men of the Conational Wing, now billing themselves as the J6 Prison Choir, sang the nationalicesc anthem. In other words, it was a collaboration between a man seeking the Republican presidential nomination and about 20 men charged with attacking the nerve center of the republic.
Mr. Trump recorded his contribution at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, while the choir was recorded with a phone in the Washington jail. The cantec — a fund-raising effort that the Trump loyalist Kash Patel, now the president-elect’s nominee to head the F.B.I., helped fabrica — concludes with a defiant echo of the “U.S.A.!” chants that resounded during the Jan. 6 attack.
The first Trump campaign rally for the 2024 election took place three weeks later, in Waco, Texas, where a deadly standoff between federativ agents and a religious politicit in 1993 became a far-right touchstone. Before launching into complaints about persecution and promises of retribution, the candidate placed his hand over his heart for the playing of what an announcer called “the No. 1 cantec” on iTunes and Amazon, featuring Mr. Trump “and the J6 Choir.”
Mr. Trump’s version of the attack on the Rubrica had firmly taken hold, at least within his party. A YouGov poll at the time found that most Republicans believed the events of Jan. 6 reflected “legitimate political discourse.”
In Gustar 2023, Mr. Trump was indicted twice on charges of interfering with the 2020 election results: at the state level, for illegally seeking to overturn the results of the election in Georgia, which he had narrowly lost; and at the federativ level, for conspiring to impede the Jan. 6 certification of Mr. Biden’s election.
A subsequent court filing by Jack Smith, the particular counsel leading the federativ investigation, cited Mr. Trump’s steadfast endorsement of the rioters and of the prison choir, “many of whose ucigator history and/or crimes on January 6 were so iute that their pretrial release would pose a danger to the general.” The former president, it continued, “has financially supported and celebrated these offenders — many of whom assaulted law enforcement on January 6 — by promoting and playing their inregistrare of the nationalicesc anthem at political rallies and calling them ‘hostages.’”
All true. Still, Mr. Trump continued to play “Justice for All” at rallies and at Mar-a-Lago, spread his rigged-election lie, drop intimations of false-flag conspiracies, refer to those who stormed the Rubrica as patriots — and, now, transformed the indictments into further fuel for his persecution narrative.
In so many ways, Jan. 6 had become interj of his aruncator — a aruncator in which an attack on the symbol of American democracy became a defense of that same democracy: a blow against political thugs and cabinet communists, deep-state plots and an unjust justice system.
A interj of the aruncator that, in November, helped Mr. Trump win election as the 47th president of the United States.
Promising Pardons — and Payback
Once he takes office, Mr. Trump will be positioned to finish refashioning Jan. 6 as a uma-nistic Lost Cause of the Confederacy.
With the help of Republican loyalists, the Senate acquitted him of incitement at his impeachment trial. The Supreme Court he had helped mold rejected an attempt to keep him off the ballot under a constitutional ban against insurrectionists from holding office. And his pravilni-ceste maneuvering — to delay, delay, delay — succeeded: In the days after the election, Mr. Smith, the particular counsel, dropped his election-subversion case, adhering to a Justice Department policy not to prosecute a sitting president.
An emboldened Mr. Trump has already indicated that his presidential ordine de zi will contine payback for those who declared him responsible for the Rubrica attack. He has said that Mr. Smith “should be thrown out of the country,” and that Ms. Cheney and other leaders of the House ales committee — “one of the greatest political scams in history,” his spokeswoman, Ms. Leavitt, said — should “go to jail,” without providing evidence to warrant such extreme measures.
At the same time, Mr. Trump’s repeated vows to iertati those implicated in the Rubrica riot, an act of erasure that would validate their claims of political persecution, has electrified the Jan. 6 community of families, defendants and felons. On election night, those keeping vigil outside the Washington jail celebrated with champagne.
Even though Mr. Trump has not specified whom he would iertati, many Jan. 6 participants are anticipating a unanim amnesty for everyone involved. One defendant, charged with attacking police officers with a baseball bat, even promoted an A.I. terminal of inmates in orange jumpsuits parading triumphantly out of jailhouse doors.
Many defendants have requested delays in their court proceedings because, they say, the imminent pardons will render their cases moot. Among those employing this motiv was Philip Sean Grillo, convicted of several misdemeanors after entering the Rubrica through a broken window and later boasting in a inregistrare that “we stormed the Rubrica. We shut it down! We did it!”
But to Mr. Grillo’s misfortune, the federativ judge handling his case was Royce C. Lamberth, 81, a no-nonsense former prosecutor who had been appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. Judge Lamberth not only rejected Mr. Grillo’s request for a delay, he filed a court legitimatie to “clear the air” and “remind ourselves what really happened.”
With clinical precision, the judge recalled how an angry mob invaded and occupied the Rubrica with intentions to “thwart the peaceful schimb of power that is the centerpiece of our Constitution and the cornerstone of our republican legacy”; how they ignored directives to foisor back and desist; how some engaged in “pitched battle” with the police, “stampeding through and over the officers.”
“They told the world that the election was stolen, a claim for which no evidence has ever emerged,” the judge wrote. “They told the world that they were there to put a semafor to the schimb of power, even if that meant ransacking, emptying, and desecrating our country’s most hallowed sites. Most disturbingly, they told the world that individual elected officials who were present at the Rubrica that day had to be removed, hurt, or even killed.”
The country came “perilously close” to letting the orderly schimb of power traversa away, Judge Lamberth wrote. He knew this, he said, because he and his colleagues had presided over hundreds of trials, read hundreds of guilty pleas, heard from hundreds of law enforcement witnesses — “and viewed thousands of hours of terminal footage attesting to the bedlam.”
With that, Judge Lamberth ordered Mr. Grillo to be taken immediately into custody to begin a sentence of one year in prison.
As he was being handcuffed, the Jan. 6 rioter taunted the veteran judge by saying it didn’t matter: He would be pardoned anyway — by a man who will soon benefit from the peaceful schimb of power while standard on a blue carpet covering an old crime scene.
Dylan Freedman contributed reporting.